nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Mark Radabaugh <mark () amplex net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:35:37 -0400
On 5/10/11 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Facebook charges $150.00 (not a great link but http://lawyerist.com/subpoena-facebook-information/On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh<mark () amplex net> wrote:On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena compliance fee. 23,000 * $150 each should only cost them $3.45M to get the information. Seems like that would take the profit out pretty quickly.+1. But don't the fees actually have to be reasonable?
Finding that on facebook's site is difficult. Other sites have Facebook charging $250 to $500 for civil subpoena fees.
Courts like precedent. I choose Facebook's precedent. Seems reasonable to me.
Mark
Current thread:
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Daniel Staal (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Robert Bonomi (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses David Conrad (May 12)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Daniel Staal (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Jimmy Hess (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Mark Radabaugh (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses William Allen Simpson (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Joel Jaeggli (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Christopher Morrow (May 11)
- Message not available
- Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Luis Marta (May 10)
- Re: Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Owen DeLong (May 10)