nanog mailing list archives
Re: Yahoo and IPv6
From: Scott Whyte <swhyte () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:06:24 -0700
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 23:10, Franck Martin <fmartin () linkedin com> wrote:
I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and IPv6 is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like: We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our site on IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, you may consider disabling IPv6.
Measurements during the experiment won't be directly comparable to those before/after, at least as far as I can see. So they will be informative, but its the slope of the brokenness line before/after that will determine when IPv6 is not an impediment to itself. -Scott
Current thread:
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6, (continued)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Igor Gashinsky (May 09)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 10)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 Tony Hain (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Tore Anderson (May 11)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Valdis . Kletnieks (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Igor Gashinsky (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Matthew Palmer (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 10)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Franck Martin (May 11)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Scott Whyte (May 12)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 12)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 Frank Bulk (May 10)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 Frank Bulk (May 10)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 Igor Gashinsky (May 11)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Lorenzo Colitti (May 13)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Bjoern A. Zeeb (May 13)
- RE: Yahoo and IPv6 George Bonser (May 13)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Randy Bush (May 13)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Matthew Petach (May 13)
- Re: Yahoo and IPv6 Owen DeLong (May 14)