nanog mailing list archives
Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:44:05 +0200
the previous paper is flawed and if the findings where true you would wonder how anyone ever created a viable online business.to me honest, what set me off was http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/advisory/csric3/wg-descriptions_v1 describing, among others, a routing working group of an fcc "communications security, reliability and interoperability council" i.e. these folk plan to write policy and procedures for operators, not just write publish or perish papers.
apologies. dorn caught my error http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/advisory/csric3/wg-descriptions_v1.pdf randy
Current thread:
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics, (continued)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics jim deleskie (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics jim deleskie (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Preferring peers over customers [was: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics] Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 05)
- Re: Preferring peers over customers [was: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics] Jared Mauch (Sep 05)
- RE: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Leigh Porter (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Patrick W. Gilmore (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)