nanog mailing list archives
Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics
From: "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobbins () arbor net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:24:38 +0000
On Sep 4, 2011, at 5:02 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Will the benefits of security - no more YouTube incidents, etc. - be perceived as worth having one's routing at the whim of an non-operational administrative monopoly?
Given recent events in SSL CA-land, how certain are we that the putative security benefits are all that great? Not to mention the near-certainty of a BGP version of 'PROTECT IP', once the mechanisms are in place. Same applies to DNSSEC, of course. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobbins () arbor net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> The basis of optimism is sheer terror. -- Oscar Wilde
Current thread:
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics, (continued)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Randy Bush (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Neil J. McRae (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Neil J. McRae (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Jennifer Rexford (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Aftab Siddiqui (Sep 05)
- Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics Anton Kapela (Sep 05)