nanog mailing list archives
Re: Optimal IPv6 router
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:07:57 -0500
On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:50:54 +0530, Glen Kent said:
Most routers today are basically IPv4 routers, with IPv6 thrown in.
Not sure if this statement is troll bait or flame bate. Probably both. ;) I see Joel has already confirmed my memory that vendors had ASICs doing IPv6 forwarding last century.
With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a more optimal IPv6 router, than what exists today?
OK, I'll bite. What would qualify as a "native IPv6" router? Is this another concept as silly as "hardware vs software based" routers? And whaqt would be the definition of "more optimal"? Just fixing the current feature parity mismatch with the IPv4 side, or you got some new routing paradigm in mind or something?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Leo Bicknell (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Rafael Rodriguez (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 06)
- RE: Optimal IPv6 router Leigh Porter (Feb 06)