nanog mailing list archives
Re: Optimal IPv6 router
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:52:30 +0900
Glen Kent wrote:
With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a more optimal IPv6 router, than what exists today?
It depends on what you want routers to do. As I am working on Tbps photonic routers with fiber delay lines, the bottleneck is at constant time (nano seconds order) electric route look up. There, several simple 4M*16bit SRAMs is fine for IPv4 with mostly /24 routing table entries. IPv6 was better because TLA had was merely 13bit long with only 8192 entries. However, as the idea of TLA was abandoned long before and a lot more than /24 is, seemingly, necessary for route look up of IPv6 backbone, I'm afraid IPv6 needs large amount of power consuming content addressable memories. Without any (defacto) standard prefix length at the IPv6 backbone, it is simply impossible to say "optimal". Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router, (continued)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Leo Bicknell (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Rafael Rodriguez (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Daniel Roesen (Feb 05)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Glen Kent (Feb 06)
- Re: Optimal IPv6 router Joel jaeggli (Feb 06)
- RE: Optimal IPv6 router Leigh Porter (Feb 06)