nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 20:46:25 -0800
On Mar 9, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> Handing one side an RIR-sponsored tactical nuclear weapon is, IMHO, on the face of it a bad idea. The proposal for classful allocation that Bill floated in the thread above would constitute doing exactly thatCertainly a risk but then we handed every nutter with BGP a dirty nuclear bomb instead. brandon
More like a small grenade which can be easily defused by their upstream at will. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Darrel Lewis (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Arturo Servin (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Brandon Butterworth (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Brandon Butterworth (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)