nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Sven Olaf Kamphuis <sven () cb3rob net>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:50:35 +0000 (UTC)
we also should have expanded the ASN to minimum 64 bits at the time it was expanded to 32 bit for exactly the same reason btw.
there -are- some technical reasons why /64's would be practical as "end-site" stuff, and if we want to be able to make all those end site networks independant, we'd need 64 bit asn's to go along with that.
but main thing: just get enough ram in your stuff, and stop imposing stupid limitations. (not my problem if your routers keep reloading the table or rebooting themselves because they're from 1993 ffs ;)
you did buy a new iphone i bet.. why no modern routers. On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:52 AM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:I'm well into my second decade of having a v6 prefix in the dfz and am passingly familiar with powers of two...Point is that expecting people globally to take a /48 from PA space probably isn't a realistic expectation.Exactly.... What's more realistic is you have to get a single /48 of PI space for people to carry that globally. And if you have 5 discontiguous networks, what the RIRs should do is carve a /44 out for your present and future PI allocations and issue you the 8 /48s; the PI /48 routing slots that you have justified need for -- arranged so that they fall within the same /45. -- -JH
Current thread:
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jared Mauch (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sascha Lenz (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Mukom Akong T. (Mar 11)