nanog mailing list archives

Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary


From: Sven Olaf Kamphuis <sven () cb3rob net>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:50:35 +0000 (UTC)

we also should have expanded the ASN to minimum 64 bits at the time it was expanded to 32 bit for exactly the same reason btw.

there -are- some technical reasons why /64's would be practical as "end-site" stuff, and if we want to be able to make all those end site networks independant, we'd need 64 bit asn's to go along with that.

but main thing: just get enough ram in your stuff, and stop imposing stupid limitations. (not my problem if your routers keep reloading the table or rebooting themselves because they're from 1993 ffs ;)

you did buy a new iphone i bet.. why no modern routers.

On Sat, 10 Mar 2012, Jimmy Hess wrote:

On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:52 AM, George Bonser <gbonser () seven com> wrote:
I'm well into my second decade of having a v6 prefix in the dfz and am
passingly familiar with powers of two...
Point is that expecting people globally to take a /48 from PA space probably isn't a realistic expectation.

Exactly....
What's more realistic is you have to get a single /48 of PI space for
people to carry that globally.

And if you have 5 discontiguous networks, what the RIRs should do is
carve a /44 out for your
present and future PI allocations   and issue you    the  8  /48s;
the PI /48 routing slots
that you have justified need for --  arranged so that they fall within
the same /45.


--
-JH



Current thread: