nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:47:24 -0800
On Mar 10, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 3/10/12 14:47 , Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:let's say, there is 6 billion people in the world.. if they all have 1 route table entry (average ;) i see no technical limitations on anything produced AFTER 2008 actually.Over in ipv4 land there are ~40k entities that appear in the dfz internet... Of those somewhat less than half (16k) announce just one prefix. The top 30 ASes by route count on the other hand are 10% of the table. I don't a see a problem with the small guys. I don't see the little guys as a source of fib scaling problem becuase oddly enough they aren't. The actors causing the most impact on the size of my fib are by in large on this mailing list... joel
I expect that many of those are not nearly as likely to create as many routes in IPv6. Hence my belief that the problem is generally solved for some time to come once we can stop carrying the bloated obsolete IPv4 table for legacy support. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jared Mauch (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sascha Lenz (Mar 10)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)