Re: shared address space... a reality!

["Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp () alvarezp ods org>]

On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:22:04 -0700, Christopher Morrow  
<christopher.morrow () gmail com> wrote:

> NetRange:       100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
> CIDR:           100.64.0.0/10
> OriginAS:
> NetName:        SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED

Weren't we supposed to *solve* the end-to-end connectivity problem,
instead of just letting it live?

Sure, this lets CGN to be more organized for operators, but those that
already have RFC5735 addresses implemented will not switch to 100.64/10
just because there's a new block. Only new players will actually benefit
from this. It will only make it easier for new players to play in
IPv4 instead of being pushed to IPv6.


--
Octavio.