nanog mailing list archives
Re: shared address space... a reality!
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:44:46 -0400
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:17:38 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
It may be easy to sell, but it's also fictitious. NAT is antithetical to security, not beneficial to it.
Anybody want to hazard a guess what % of Vint Cerf's famous 140M compromised boxes were behind a NAT and still got pwned by a drive-by fruiting?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: shared address space... a reality!, (continued)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Octavio Alvarez (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Octavio Alvarez (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! cdel.firsthand.net (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Dave Edelman (Mar 17)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher LILJENSTOLPE (Mar 17)