nanog mailing list archives
Re: shared address space... a reality!
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:35:42 -0400
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp () alvarezp ods org> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:22:04 -0700, Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow () gmail com> wrote:NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255 CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10 OriginAS: NetName: SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVEDWeren't we supposed to *solve* the end-to-end connectivity problem, instead of just letting it live?
"We" forgot to ask if all the stakeholders wanted it solved. Most self-styled "enterprise" operators don't: they want a major control point at the network border. Deliberately breaking end to end makes that control more certain. Which is why they deployed IPv4 NAT boxen long before address scarcity became an impactful issue. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
Current thread:
- Re: shared address space... a reality!, (continued)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! John Curran (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 15)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 14)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Octavio Alvarez (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Christopher Morrow (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- RE: shared address space... a reality! George Bonser (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! William Herrin (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! cdel.firsthand.net (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Owen DeLong (Mar 16)
- Re: shared address space... a reality! Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 16)