nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver
From: Wayne E Bouchard <web () typo org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:18:16 -0700
It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from <insert provider here>. Hardly something to hold against them until the rest of us can all get our own houses in order... On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:41:48PM -0700, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 14 October 2013 12:57, Tri Tran <tritran () cox net> wrote:They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation interval. How reliable are they? Tri TranIt's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from Cogent; so, effectively, in 2013, you still can't get IPv6 connectivity from Cogent. C.
--- Wayne Bouchard web () typo org Network Dude http://www.typo.org/~web/
Current thread:
- Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Tri Tran (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Brent Jones (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Robert Glover (Oct 14)
- RE: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Eric C. Miller (Oct 24)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Blake Dunlap (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver staticsafe (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Seth Mattinen (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Matthew Petach (Oct 18)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)