nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver
From: "Eric C. Miller" <eric () ericheather com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 02:30:27 +0000
I'm in the middle of converting IPV4 to dualstack with Cogent. I was told that they don't have IPV6 in the edge in Tampa yet, so they are VLANing us to a core device to give us v6. So by dualstack, they must mean dualstack only from an OSI Layer 1 approach. Heartburn city..... Robert, do you have any advice from working with their ipv6 stuff, yet? Eric Miller, CCNP Network Engineering Consultant (407) 257-5115 -----Original Message----- From: Robert Glover [mailto:robertg () garlic com] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 4:36 PM To: tritran () cox net Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver We've had them since May 2008. Recently upgraded from 100Mb to 250Mb. Had minor issues here and there (no outages to speak of). I've had some IPv6 issues since moving the link to dual-stack a few months back, but we are not deploying IPv6 to end-users yet, so I'll let them slide on that. On 10/14/2013 12:57 PM, Tri Tran wrote:
They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation interval. How reliable are they? Tri Tran
Current thread:
- Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Tri Tran (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Brent Jones (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Robert Glover (Oct 14)
- RE: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Eric C. Miller (Oct 24)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Blake Dunlap (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Constantine A. Murenin (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver staticsafe (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Seth Mattinen (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Matthew Petach (Oct 18)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Wayne E Bouchard (Oct 14)
- Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver Bryan Tong (Oct 14)