Re: Cogent 100M DIA in Denver

["Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc () gmail com>]

On 14 October 2013 14:18, Wayne E Bouchard <web () typo org> wrote:
> It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from
> <insert provider here>.
>
> Hardly something to hold against them until the rest of us can all get
> our own houses in order...

Which other provider?  Please name at least one.

Other providers either offer IPv6, or don't.  When those other
providers do, good or bad, you can connect to any other IPv6 network
(well, except maybe for Cogent's AS174).

When Cogent offers IPv6, a lot of IPv6 networks are unreachable.  No
other provider comes close.

I mean, even their web-site doesn't work from many IPv6-connected
hosts, because there's no route for their network:

li163-XXX:~# telnet cogentco.com http
Trying 2001:550:1::cc01...
^C
li163-XXX:~#

C.

> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 01:41:48PM -0700, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> > On 14 October 2013 12:57, Tri Tran <tritran () cox net> wrote:
> > > They're lit in the bulding and have a much faster installation interval. How reliable are they?
> > > Tri Tran
> >
> > It's worth pointing out that many IPv6 networks are unavailable from
> > Cogent; so, effectively, in 2013, you still can't get IPv6
> > connectivity from Cogent.
> >
> > C.