nanog mailing list archives
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:08:04 +0300
At 18:10 12/08/2014 -0400, William Herrin wrote:We went with 768 - enough time to replace the routers with ASR9010s. It is merely a stop-gap measure to give everyone time to replace their routers in an orderly fashion.
-Hank
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il> wrote:> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.htmlI note that the recommended command in that article, "mls cef maximum-routes ip 1000", will throw most of your IPv6 routes out of the TCAM instead. Which if you have any IPv6 traffic of substance just kills you in the other direction. Might want to try something more like "mls cef maximum-routes ip 900". Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside com bill () herrin us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> Can I solve your unusual networking challenges?
Current thread:
- So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 12)
- Re: ****SPAM:5.2**** Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Tom Hill (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Matthew Petach (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Jon Lewis (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Warren Kumari (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today joel jaeggli (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Geoff Huston (Aug 13)