nanog mailing list archives
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster () mykolab com>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:14:33 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 8/13/2014 11:09 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 8/13/14 8:55 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:Apologies for replying to my own post, but... below: On 8/13/2014 7:05 AM, Paul Ferguson wrote:p.s. I recall some IPv6 prefix growth routing projections by Vince Fuller and Tony Li from several years ago which illustrated this, but cannot find a reference at the moment....The raws workshop report makes for interesting reading, especially with respect to how things actually turned out now that we're a decade on. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4984
Thanks for that -- I had completely forgotten about it. :-) - - ferg
I found it: "Scaling issues with ipv6 routing+multihoming" Vince Fuller, Cisco Systems http://iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2011/03/vaf-iab-raws.pdf I think the slides [above] were done for an IAB routing workshop in ~2006. Also: "Scaling of Internet Routing and Addressing: past view, present reality,and possible futures" Vince Fuller, Cisco Systems http://www.vaf.net/~vaf/apricotworkshop.pdf FYI, - ferg
- -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlPrqwkACgkQKJasdVTchbJcDQEA15MMXnmxFgk3MVVJ0ikgFTtO 6XNwJ6nSqL7a6Lq/xvYA/3MM8xA4wrj6Qfy5KDyjOCu3v+hZbTok9gqNHZ+6JZSO =ef9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today, (continued)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Matthew Petach (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Jon Lewis (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today McElearney, Kevin (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Leo Bicknell (Aug 12)
- Message not available
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Warren Kumari (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today joel jaeggli (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Geoff Huston (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Merike Kaeo (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Måns Nilsson (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Randy Bush (Aug 14)