nanog mailing list archives
Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 09:22:45 +0200
Subject: Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Date: Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:27:46AM -0700 Quoting Merike Kaeo (merike () doubleshotsecurity com):
B: they *did* know about the issue, but convincing management to spend the cash to buy hardware that doesn't suck was hard, because "everything is working fine at the moment" -- some folk needed things to fail spectacularity to be able to justify shelling out the $$$ ( yes, they could recard the TCAM, but they are using this as an excuse to get some real gear)…Oh yeah, I'd bet this is also the case. Just like in 'security' related issues….
This is why "test crash" was introduced. http://markmail.org/message/tu46ecy272o3stvp /Måns, just rebooted. (with a new carving already configured) -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 Thousands of days of civilians ... have produced a ... feeling for the aesthetic modules --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today, (continued)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Leo Bicknell (Aug 12)
- Message not available
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Hank Nussbacher (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 12)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Warren Kumari (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today joel jaeggli (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Paul Ferguson (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Geoff Huston (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Merike Kaeo (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Måns Nilsson (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Chris Woodfield (Aug 13)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today Randy Bush (Aug 14)
- Re: So Philip Smith / Geoff Huston's CIDR report becomes worth a good hard look today William Herrin (Aug 14)