nanog mailing list archives

Re: Nat


From: Josh Reynolds <josh () kyneticwifi com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:44:03 -0600

Publicly shame them by listing the ones who don't fully support IPv6. List
them here, so we know to choose their competition.
On Dec 16, 2015 8:39 PM, "Berry Mobley" <berry () gadsdenst org> wrote:

At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:

We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.

this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory.  load of
crap.

make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise.  repeat the
previous sentence 42 times.


This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of them
are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it won't help
you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to their stuff.

Berry



Current thread: