Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

[Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>]

Tell a start-up ISP it'll be $10k - $25k for PI IPs and they'll laugh in your face. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 
http://www.ics-il.com 



Midwest Internet Exchange 
http://www.midwest-ix.com 


----- Original Message -----

From: "Mel Beckman" <mel () beckman org> 
To: "Owen DeLong" <owen () delong com> 
Cc: nanog () nanog org 
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 2:37:53 PM 
Subject: Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion 

Owen, 

Paying for IPv4 space definitely raises the capital requirements for any new provider startup. It's not so bad right 
now, when deals are plentiful in the $10k to $20k range for /24s. But when a /24 hits $100K, bootstrapping a new ISP 
will be impossible. 

-mel beckman 

> On Jul 8, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote: 
>
> I think the “THING” that people are starting to worry about is how to deploy a network when you can’t get IPv4 space 
> for it at a reasonable price. 
>
> Owen 
>
> > On Jul 8, 2015, at 11:47 , Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote: 
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 8/Jul/15 17:59, Mel Beckman wrote: 
> > > Greg, 
> > >
> > > After investigating what a previous poster said about Cisco and Juniper, I'm getting the feeling that not all major 
> > > impediments to running MPLS over IPv6-only networks have been addressed. 
> > >
> > > Your comment mentions LDP IPv6 support. Do you now handle all the major gaps identified the the IETF MPLS IPv6 Gap 
> > > Analysis (RFC7439) from this last January? 
> > >
> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7439#section-3 
> > >
> > > It seems like their are still gaps in the MPLS spec itself before IPv6 has parity with IPv4 in MPLS. 
> >
> > The LDPv6 support is just the control plane portion to get labels 
> > assigned to IPv6 addresses. This should get you basic forwarding of 
> > encapsulation and forwarding of IPv6 traffic in MPLS. The immediate 
> > use-case would be removal of IPv6 BGP routing in the core, if that is 
> > your thing. 
> >
> > Otherwise, yes, there are still a bunch of MPLS gaps that need to be 
> > fixed for those additional services to run natively over an IPv6-only 
> > network. Baby steps... 
> >
> > Mark.