nanog mailing list archives
Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:16:24 +0000
Yes, the reason is that we'd never had ARIN turn down a request due to space exhaustion before. In 12 months we'll see the prices will go up significantly. Don't underestimate the demand, which is easily measured via ARIN space allocation reports. That demand rate has very little flexibility, and the businesses asking for /21 and above are willing to pay for the space. It's not the "two guys and a router" startups asking for a mere /23 or /24. These are generally pre-existing businesses or well-funded startups. -mel beckman
On Jul 9, 2015, at 5:53 AM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote: There is a reason we have not seen any rise in the price even after multiple years with depletion in large parts of the world.
Current thread:
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion, (continued)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Greg Hankins (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mike Hammett (Jul 08)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Baldur Norddahl (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mark Tinka (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion manning (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Mel Beckman (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Owen DeLong (Jul 09)
- Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion Baldur Norddahl (Jul 09)