nanog mailing list archives

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality


From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () meetinghouse net>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:24:10 -0500

Scott,

Asymmetric measured where? Between client and server or between servers? I'm thinking the case where we each have a server running locally - how do you get a high level of asymmetry in a P2P environment?

Miles Fidelman



Scott Helms wrote:

Anything based on NNTP would be extremely asymmetric without significant changes to the protocol or human behavior.

We ran significant Usenet servers with binaries for nearly 20 years and without for another 5 and the servers' traffic was heavily asymmetric.

On Mar 1, 2015 9:11 AM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman () meetinghouse net <mailto:mfidelman () meetinghouse net>> wrote:

    Aled Morris wrote:


        Sadly we don't have many "killer applications" for symmetric
        residential
        bandwidth, but that's likely because we don't have the
        infrastructure to
        incubate these applications.


    Come to think of it, if USENET software wasn't so cumbersome, I
    kind of wonder if today's "social network" would consist of home
    servers running NNTP - and I expect the traffic would be very
    symmetric. (For that matter, with a few tweaks, the USENET model
    would be great for "groupware" - anybody remember the Netscape
    communications server that added private newsgroups and
    authentication to the mix?)

    Miles Fidelman



-- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra



--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra


Current thread: