nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
From: joel jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 19:14:05 -0800
On 3/1/15 7:24 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Scott, Asymmetric measured where? Between client and server or between servers? I'm thinking the case where we each have a server running locally - how do you get a high level of asymmetry in a P2P environment?
The most densly connected relays by definition have more outgoing than incoming given the nature of a protocol where messages are flooded by senders. this is widely reflected in freenix 1000 rankings. http://top1000.anthologeek.net/ likewise if you are and edge you will undoubtedly receive more than you originate.
Miles Fidelman Scott Helms wrote:Anything based on NNTP would be extremely asymmetric without significant changes to the protocol or human behavior. We ran significant Usenet servers with binaries for nearly 20 years and without for another 5 and the servers' traffic was heavily asymmetric. On Mar 1, 2015 9:11 AM, "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman () meetinghouse net <mailto:mfidelman () meetinghouse net>> wrote: Aled Morris wrote: Sadly we don't have many "killer applications" for symmetric residential bandwidth, but that's likely because we don't have the infrastructure to incubate these applications. Come to think of it, if USENET software wasn't so cumbersome, I kind of wonder if today's "social network" would consist of home servers running NNTP - and I expect the traffic would be very symmetric. (For that matter, with a few tweaks, the USENET model would be great for "groupware" - anybody remember the Netscape communications server that added private newsgroups and authentication to the mix?) Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality, (continued)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Jack Bates (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Barry Shein (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Owen DeLong (Feb 28)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Aled Morris (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Miles Fidelman (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Scott Helms (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Miles Fidelman (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Scott Helms (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Miles Fidelman (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality John Levine (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality joel jaeggli (Mar 01)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Barry Shein (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Scott Helms (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Barry Shein (Mar 03)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Scott Helms (Mar 03)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Barry Shein (Mar 03)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Scott Helms (Mar 10)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Barry Shein (Mar 10)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Miles Fidelman (Mar 02)
- Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality Dave Taht (Mar 01)