nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: Uptick in spam
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 08:26:31 -0400
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 08:09:00AM -0400, Ian Smith wrote:
This is the part that's been bugging me. Doesn't the NANOG server implement SPF checking on inbound list mail?
Don't know, but it doesn't matter: SPF has zero anti-spam value. (I know. I've studied this in ridiculous detail using a very large corpus of spam/nonspam messages over a very long period of time.) There are much better methods available. ---rsk
Current thread:
- Uptick in spam anthony kasza (Oct 26)
- RE: Uptick in spam Milt Aitken (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam John Peach (Oct 26)
- AW: Uptick in spam Jürgen Jaritsch (Oct 26)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Octavio Alvarez (Oct 26)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Geoffrey Keating (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Peter Beckman (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Hunter Fuller (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam John Levine (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- AW: Uptick in spam Jürgen Jaritsch (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam Jutta Zalud (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Colin Johnston (Oct 27)