nanog mailing list archives
Re: AW: Uptick in spam
From: Peter Beckman <beckman () angryox com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:59:29 -0400
Wouldn't that be interesting -- you can't join NANOG unless your email domain publishes an SPF record with a -all rule. That would raise the bar AND prevent the kind of thing that happened this weekend. On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
... and thus a suitable topic for NANOG, I guess, rather than a mail abuse list, because it's best use is for domains that send no mail and recieve no mail and don't want anything to do with mail and stil get spam complaints.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Beckman Internet Guy beckman () angryox com http://www.angryox.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Uptick in spam anthony kasza (Oct 26)
- RE: Uptick in spam Milt Aitken (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam John Peach (Oct 26)
- AW: Uptick in spam Jürgen Jaritsch (Oct 26)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Octavio Alvarez (Oct 26)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Geoffrey Keating (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Peter Beckman (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Hunter Fuller (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam John Levine (Oct 27)
- Re: AW: Uptick in spam Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 27)
- AW: Uptick in spam Jürgen Jaritsch (Oct 26)
- Re: Uptick in spam Jutta Zalud (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Ian Smith (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Colin Johnston (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam anthony kasza (Oct 27)
- Re: Uptick in spam Rich Kulawiec (Oct 27)