nanog mailing list archives
Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:17:38 +0200
On 10/Jun/16 19:08, Christopher Morrow wrote:
oh, so I didn't misunderstand.. that makes 'backup isp' less useful, no?
With regard to reaching our network, not true. You would still be able to reach our network if your primary service with us failed, but not via a local peer. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention, (continued)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 08)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) (Jun 09)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Job Snijders (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Leo Bicknell (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 11)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Hugo Slabbert (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Randy Bush (Jun 10)