nanog mailing list archives
Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 20:10:58 +0200
On 10/Jun/16 19:19, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
Unless it's mitigated by you accepting customer A's prefixes from any transits you have,
This. Mark.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Current thread:
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention, (continued)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Leo Bicknell (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Joe Provo (Jun 11)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Christopher Morrow (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Hugo Slabbert (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention Randy Bush (Jun 10)