nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: James Bensley <jwbensley () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:51:05 +0100
On 22 May 2018 at 09:14, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
I'm more curious about use-cases for folk considering SR, than SR itself. 4 years on, and I still can't find a reason to replace my LDP network with SR. Your use-case makes sense, as it sounds like Cisco deliberately left LDP out of your box, considering SR is in. But that's a whole other discussion :-)...
I'm also interested in the uses cases. As a "typical" service provider (whatever that means) who doesn't have any SR specific requirements such as service chaining, the only reason/feature SR has which currently makes me want to deploy it is TI-FLA (to improve our (r)LFA coverage) - but this is only for failure scenarios so under normal working conditions as far as I know, there is no benefit available to us right now. Cheers, James.
Current thread:
- Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing James Bensley (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Ca By (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)