nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: Matt Geary <matt.geary () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:06:55 +0200
Yes we are considering changing to SR on our backbone because LDP is not supported on the nexus switches. Although, we have no experience with SR and looks plainly simple but we loose some of the LSP path selection. On Tue, May 22, 2018, 10:05 Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
On 18/May/18 12:11, Matt Geary wrote: Hello maillist anyone had any experience with segment routing and its performance over LDP? We are evaluating the option to move to SR over LDP so we can label switch across our Nexus L3 switching environment. Is your use-case because you need label switching and the Nexus does not support LDP? Mark.
Current thread:
- Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing James Bensley (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Ca By (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)