nanog mailing list archives
Re: Segment Routing
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:38:17 +0300
On 22 May 2018 at 12:36, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu> wrote:
I was excited about SR because I thought it would finally enable native MPLSv6 forwarding. But alas...
Why 'alas'? In ISIS you're free to signal Prefix-SID on IPv4 or IPv6, there isn't anything inherently IPv4 in the standard. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing James Bensley (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Ca By (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing dip (May 21)
- Re: Segment Routing Matt Geary (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Mark Tinka (May 22)
- Re: Segment Routing Saku Ytti (May 22)