nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: James Jun <james.jun () towardex com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 14:01:46 -0500
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 06:45:50PM +0000, Nikolas Geyer wrote:
Throwing my support behind continuing the experiment also. A singular complaint from a company advertising unallocated ASN and IPv4 resources (the irony) does not warrant cessation of the experiment.
Agreed; Please resume the experiment. We're all operators here, and we MUST have confidence that BGP speakers on our network are compliant with protocol specification. Experiments like this are opportunities for a real-life validation of how our devices handle messages that are out of the norm, and help us identify issues. Kudos to researchers by the way, for sending courtesy announcements in advance, and testing against some common platforms available to them (Cisco, Quagga & BIRD) prior to the experiment. James
Current thread:
- RE: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Brian Kantor (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 31)