nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 11:23:01 +0200
Hey,
This is because you did your due diligence during the testing. Do you have statistics on the probability of these "complex" bugs occurrence?
No. I wish I had and I hope to make change on this. Try to translate how good investment test is, how many customer outages it has saved etc. I suspect simple bugs are found by vendor, complex bugs are not economic to find. And testing is more proof of work than business case. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Brian Kantor (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Paul S. (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Mike Tancsa (Jan 24)
- Re: Global statistics during the experiment (was Re: BGP Experiment) Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mike Hale (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment valdis . kletnieks (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Tom Beecher (Jan 25)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy via NANOG (Jan 25)