nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Brian Kantor <Brian () ampr org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 07:57:37 -0800
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 03:49:46PM -0000, adamv0025 () netconsultings com wrote:
This actually makes me thing that it might be worthwhile including these types of test to the regression testing suite. So that every time we evaluate new code or vendor we don't only test for functionality, performance and scalability, but also for robustness i.e. sending a whole heap of trash down the sockets which are accessible form the Internet (via the iACL holes), to limit the scope of the test. Rather than relying on experiments to notify us the hard way that something is not right. adam
I agree. It seems to me that testing with almost-valid data (well formed, but with disallowed values) as well as fuzz-testing are essential parts of software quality control. - Brian
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tinka (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Brian Kantor (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 24)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Randy Bush (Jan 31)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Paul S. (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)