Re: RIPE our of IPv4

[Mark Andrews <marka () isc org>]

It requires both sides to move to IPv6.  Why should the cost of maintaining working networks be borne alone by the 
eyeball networks?   That is what is mostly happening today with CGN.

Every server that offers services to the public should be making them available over IPv6.   Most of the CDNs support 
both transports. Why are you scared to tick the box for IPv6?  HTTPS doesn’t care which transport is used. 

-- 
Mark Andrews

> On 26 Nov 2019, at 03:53, Dmitry Sherman <dmitry () interhost net> wrote:
>
>  I believe it’s Eyeball network’s matter to free IPv4 blocks and move to v6.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Dmitry Sherman
>
>
>
> > > On 25 Nov 2019, at 18:08, Billy Crook <BCrook () unrealservers net> wrote:
> > 
> > Huh.  I guess we get to go home early today then?  And look into that whole "Aye Pee Vee Sicks" thing next week aye 
> > boss?
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Dmitry Sherman <dmitry () interhost net> wrote:
> > > Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
> > >
> > > Dear colleagues,
> > >
> > > Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4 allocation from the last remaining addresses 
> > > in our available pool. We have now run out of IPv4 addresses.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Dmitry Sherman
> > > Interhost Networks
> > > www.interhost.co.il
> > > Dmitry () interhost net
> > > Mob: 054-3181182
> > > Sent from Steve's creature