nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE our of IPv4
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 10:43:36 -0800
That’s absurd… Yes, you have to support both for now. However, you really only need IPv4 addresses on each front-end box and you only need that until the proportion of eyeball users that lack IPv6 capabilities is small enough to be considered no longer worth the cost of support. I doubt seriously that the quantity of eyeball users you would consider cost effective to support is one. Case in point: Do your servers still support non-SNI compliant browsers? Do you limit your pages to compatibility with IE version 10? Owen
On Nov 25, 2019, at 11:50 , Dmitry Sherman <dmitry () interhost net> wrote: Because we can’t only use ipv6 on the boxes, each box with ipv6 must have IPv4 until the last eyeball broadband user will have ipv6 support. Best regards, Dmitry Sherman Interhost Networks www.interhost.co.il Dmitry () interhost net Mob: 054-3181182 Sent from Steve's creatureOn 25 Nov 2019, at 21:47, Mark Andrews <marka () isc org> wrote: It requires both sides to move to IPv6. Why should the cost of maintaining working networks be borne alone by the eyeball networks? That is what is mostly happening today with CGN. Every server that offers services to the public should be making them available over IPv6. Most of the CDNs support both transports. Why are you scared to tick the box for IPv6? HTTPS doesn’t care which transport is used. -- Mark AndrewsOn 26 Nov 2019, at 03:53, Dmitry Sherman <dmitry () interhost net> wrote: I believe it’s Eyeball network’s matter to free IPv4 blocks and move to v6. Best regards, Dmitry ShermanOn 25 Nov 2019, at 18:08, Billy Crook <BCrook () unrealservers net> wrote: Huh. I guess we get to go home early today then? And look into that whole "Aye Pee Vee Sicks" thing next week aye boss? On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Dmitry Sherman <dmitry () interhost net <mailto:dmitry () interhost net>> wrote: Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4: Dear colleagues, Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4 allocation from the last remaining addresses in our available pool. We have now run out of IPv4 addresses. Best regards, Dmitry Sherman Interhost Networks www.interhost.co.il <http://www.interhost.co.il/> Dmitry () interhost net <mailto:Dmitry () interhost net> Mob: 054-3181182 Sent from Steve's creature
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4, (continued)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Nov 30)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Brandon Martin (Nov 30)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Matthew Kaufman (Nov 30)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Jared Mauch (Nov 30)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Matthew Kaufman (Nov 30)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Billy Crook (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Dmitry Sherman (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mark Andrews (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Dmitry Sherman (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Doug Barton (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Valdis Klētnieks (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Mike Hammett (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Doug Barton (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Brandon Martin (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Doug Barton (Nov 25)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 bzs (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Matt Palmer (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Matthew Kaufman (Nov 30)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Sabri Berisha (Nov 26)
- Re: RIPE our of IPv4 Ca By (Nov 26)