nanog mailing list archives
Re: BFD for long haul circuit
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:57:31 +0200
On 17/Jul/20 11:50, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Fortunately .... very fortunately Mark.
Hehe, I meant in the context of not having a similar condition as the OP.
L2VPNs running on someone's IP backbone sold by many as "circuits" has many issues ... stability, MTU blackhols, random drops - and that is pretty much the same all over the world :( Very unfortunate technology just to mux more users and get more $$$ from single investment.
Can't argue with you. I suppose a lot of customers go for it because they need an Ethernet service slower than 1Gbps, and 1Gbps via a DWDM service is pricier. Where I've seen it be popular is in intercontinental circuits that customers want in order to test a market with as little exposure as possible. Mark.
Current thread:
- BFD for long haul circuit Harivishnu Abhilash (Jul 16)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Saku Ytti (Jul 16)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 16)
- RE: BFD for long haul circuit Harivishnu Abhilash (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 16)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Robert Raszuk (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Tom Hill (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Nick Hilliard (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Tom Hill (Jul 17)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 17)
- RE: BFD for long haul circuit Harivishnu Abhilash (Jul 17)
- RE: BFD for long haul circuit adamv0025 (Jul 18)
- Re: BFD for long haul circuit Mark Tinka (Jul 18)