nanog mailing list archives

Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is the policy about sharing email offlist?


From: Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 01:34:33 -0500

Why are you emailing me?

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:54 PM Jeff P <jeffp () jeffp us> wrote:

SEE!?!

With no evidence yet publicly acknowledged as to who added the AOC email
to the list now they are just accusing some random "A woman!"

Words (The Pen) are mightier than any brute force (The Sword).

And you did it without thought, just piled on. It came as natural to you
as putting on your shoes in the morning.

JeffP
jeffp () jeffp us



*Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*

NOTICE:
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Use or dissemination by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail to correct our records.
Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its
entirety, including any backup processes that your system may perform.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure
or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender,
therefore, does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the
contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.




---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lorell Hathcock <lorell () hathcock org>
Date: Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' Office is on NANOG?? Or, what is
the policy about sharing email offlist?
To: Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us>
Cc: nanog <nanog () nanog org>


A-woman!

Sincerely,

Lorell Hathcock

On Jan 18, 2021, at 1:36 PM, Javier J <javier () advancedmachines us> wrote:


I agree 100%.

I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine.  What I don't
appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list
because of someone's behavior.

- Javier

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org> wrote:

There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be
private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."
The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it,
should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain
what caused them to do that and have undone it.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:

The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.

https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/

On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
 Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is
the
 policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing
 offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that
someone.
 Anne

 --
 Anne P. Mitchell,  Attorney at Law
 Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
 Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam
law)
 Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
 Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
 Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)



----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis, MCP :)           |  I route
  StackPath, Sr. Neteng       |  therefore you are
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________



Current thread: