Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

[Shawn L via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>]

Agreed.  Don't fix what isn't broken.


-----Original Message-----
From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:33pm
To: "Randy Bush" <randy () psg com>, "Rod Beck" <rod.beck () unitedcablecompany com>
Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog () nanog org>
Subject: Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?




On 3/20/21 20:06, Randy Bush wrote:

> i do not find the volume or diversity on the nanog list problematic.
> in fact, i suspect its diversity and openness are major factors in
> it being the de facto global anything-ops list. perhaps we do not
> need to fix that.

Simple. As. That.

Mark.