nanog mailing list archives
Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 10:18:35 +0200
On 3/22/21 15:14, Mike Hammett wrote:
I would love to have HTTP GUI that just does all of the dirty work. However, a sufficient number of people affiliated with that organization do indeed need to be able to CLI their way through the troubleshooting process for when the HTTP GUI inevitably fails (everything inevitably fails).
And this is where it tends to fall flat - when the GUI fails and an engineer can no longer setup a peering session with CLI.
The GUI is written in code, much of which will be via CLI. So we can't really run away from CLI, unless we are saying that CLI is reserved for those who use it to build the GUI, and not for those for whom the GUI is being built.
You can also implement a reasonable amount of automation without a GUI. My goal is to babysit as few layers as possible. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?, (continued)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Stan Barber (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Matthew Petach (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? David Siegel (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Eric Kuhnke (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? J. Hellenthal via NANOG (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 22)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mike Hammett (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Emil Pfeffer (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Valdis Klētnieks (Mar 23)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Robert Brockway (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Mark Tinka (Mar 24)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? scott (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? Randy Bush (Mar 20)
- Re: Perhaps it's time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...? james.cutler () consultant com (Mar 21)