nanog mailing list archives
Re: multihoming
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:12:16 +0100
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 08:16, Masataka Ohta < mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
So, as modifying end systems is inevitable, there is no reason not to support full end to end multihoming including modifications to support multiple addresses by TCP and some applications. Masataka Ohta
Are you proposing SCTP? There is sadly not much more hope for widespread adoption of that as of IPv6. Regards, Baldur
Current thread:
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying, (continued)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 20)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 21)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Måns Nilsson (Nov 21)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 22)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 22)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- multihoming Dave Taht (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Saku Ytti (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Geoff Huston (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Michael Thomas (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta via NANOG (Nov 24)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Eliot Lear (Nov 21)