nanog mailing list archives
Re: multihoming
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 16:20:27 +0200
On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 16:16, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl () gmail com> wrote:
Are you proposing SCTP? There is sadly not much more hope for widespread adoption of that as of IPv6.
If you use Apple, you use MP-TCP, for better UX while using both mobile and wifi. SCTP is no good, because you cannot transition between two connections, they have to overlap for a period, there is no separation of identity and location. QUIC actually can do that, in that identity is PKI and location is IP address, so you could roam from one IP to another IP without having overlapping connectivity. -- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying, (continued)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 21)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Måns Nilsson (Nov 21)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 22)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 22)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 23)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- multihoming Dave Taht (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta (Nov 23)
- Re: multihoming Baldur Norddahl (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Saku Ytti (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Geoff Huston (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Christopher Morrow (Nov 24)
- Re: multihoming Bjørn Mork (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Michael Thomas (Nov 25)
- Re: multihoming Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 27)
- Re: multihoming Masataka Ohta via NANOG (Nov 24)
- Re: is ipv6 fast, was silly Redeploying Owen DeLong via NANOG (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Eliot Lear (Nov 21)
- Re: Redeploying most of 127/8, 0/8, 240/4 and *.0 as unicast Lincoln Dale (Nov 22)