tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: how many stable branches to have
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 11:29:07 -0700
On May 21, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca> wrote:
I have no problem with having lts- branches created for distros, and I'd rather do that than have "old stable". I'd rather call them something like: wheezy-4.7 or centos7-4.7
So, if both Chocolate Coated Spinach Linux "Orangina" and Pink Frog BSD 5.7 were released with tcpdump 4.7, would we have separate orangina-4.7 and pinkfrog5.7-4.7 branches for them? _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- how many stable branches to have Michael Richardson (May 21)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Guy Harris (May 21)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Michael Richardson (May 22)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Michal Sekletar (May 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: how many stable branches to have Francois-Xavier Le Bail (May 26)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Michal Sekletar (May 26)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Francois-Xavier Le Bail (Jun 03)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Denis Ovsienko (Jun 08)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Michal Sekletar (May 26)
- Re: how many stable branches to have Guy Harris (May 21)