tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: New official link-layer type request
From: Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 15:21:18 -0700
On May 12, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Damir Franusic <damir.franusic () gmail com> wrote:
I've tried to be as prompt and as accurate as possible so here is the draft, I hope you'll appreciate the effort. I agree that the initial thing I sent was an abomination. I will work on this draft as the project progresses, but for now, it covers everything implemented so far. http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/cgi-bin/xml2rfc.cgi?url=http://socket.hr/draft-dfranusic-elee-00.xml&modeAsFormat=html/ascii
Currently, the spec says that in a "Target PDU with CC data", the "Data size" field is the "Size of CC data encoded using the value from Df_type field (UINT32 field)" and the "Data" field is the "Raw CC packet data". The "Df_type" field has values: 0x01 Libpcap File Format (PCAP) 0x02 ASN.1 Basic Encoding Rules (BER) 0x03 ELEE Encapsulation What do those values mean in this context? For a value of 0x01, does that mean that the "Raw CC packet data" contains a pcap record: https://www.tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap-savefile.5.html with a time stamp, captured data length, and on-the-network data length, followed by packet data? If so, what indicates the time stamp resolution and the link-layer type of the packet data? Presumably 0x02 means BER-encoded ASN.1 data according to some ETSI specification, as per
The format of that delivery if defined by ETSI; they describe everything in great detail by using ASN.1 notation which is then encoded using BER when sent by wire.
What ETSI specification is that? And what does 0x03 mean? If it's an "ELEE Encapsulation", it would presumably need to be defined by the ELEE spec itself, but it's not currently defined in that spec. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Re: New official link-layer type request, (continued)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 17)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Michael Richardson (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 18)
- Message not available
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 11)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 11)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 11)
- Message not available
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 12)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Michael Richardson (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Damir Franusic (May 18)
- Re: New official link-layer type request Guy Harris (May 18)