Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
RE: Civil Disobedience
From: Mr Rufus Faloofus <foofus () foofus net>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 17:00:34 -0500
At 05:00 PM 10/15/01 -0400, Joshua Fritsch wrote:
What concerns me is will they be able to prosecute someone who discloses a vulnerability if that vuln is then used to write something along the lines of Nimda?
Worse still, aren't the people who reverse-engineered Nimda in order to write fixes liable for prosecution under the DMCA? --Foofus.
Current thread:
- Re: Civil Disobedience, (continued)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Josh Crane (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Hire, Ejay (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience George Milliken (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Joe Shaw (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience j03 (Oct 16)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Jordan (Oct 17)
- Re: Civil Disobedience TD - Sales International Holland B.V. (Oct 16)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Shaun Dewberry (Oct 16)
- Re: Civil Disobedience T. Barrick (Oct 17)
- Re: Civil Disobedience White Vampire (Oct 17)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Mr Rufus Faloofus (Oct 15)
- re: Civil Disobedience Clinton Smith (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience George Milliken (Oct 16)
- RE: Civil Disobedience William T. Barrett (Oct 16)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Abel Wisman (Oct 16)
- Re: Civil Disobedience terry white (Oct 17)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Abel Wisman (Oct 16)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Aleem (Oct 17)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Abel Wisman (Oct 16)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Hire, Ejay (Oct 16)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Hire, Ejay (Oct 16)
- Re: Civil Disobedience dan . ellis (Oct 16)