Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Civil Disobedience
From: "Jon O ." <jono () microshaft org>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:53:00 -0700
Yes, these are interesting developments. Furthermore, take a look at this: RIAA Wants to Hack Your PC http://www.wired.com/news/conflict/0,2100,47552,00.html Seems there is some kind of double standard. In response to these new laws and moves by groups like the RIAA, some people have been discussing the formation of a Technical Engineering Guild. The idea of this Guild is to speak as a group against certain aspects of these laws that USENIX and the ACM have been speaking out against. The Guild list is here: http://lists.anti-dmca.org/mailman/listinfo/IT_union On 15-Oct-2001, Ethan Zimmer wrote:
John Thornton wrote:( Moderator: Please pass this though Blue Boar. Please just allow this thread even if it is just for a day ) In case you have been living under a rock the past few weeks. You should know that our civil liberties are under attack. Kevin Poulsen wrote: "Hackers, virus-writers and web site defacers would face life imprisonment without the possibility of parole under legislation proposed by the Bush Administration that would classify most computer crimes as acts of terrorism." ( http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257, Hackers face life imprisonment under 'Anti-Terrorism' Act). When you read the news this morning you will see that this bill was passed by the Senate. (http://www.securityfocus.com/news/265, Senate passes terror bill). I will say that most of the readers of this news group are not hackers but Network Administrators that are very involved with the Security Community. That is why I am asking you, not to report minor scans against your network to the abuse department of any ISP if this bill becomes law. I as a Network Administrator for many years now have been on a routine to check my logs for scans against my network every morning and send the logs of attacks to the abuse department of the ISP. I encourage every NetworkI can't begin to count the number of times that visitors to our site, whom just got that spiffy new firewall on their windows box, have emailed me, cc'd to the FBI, our upstream, and anyone else they can think of claiming our servers were "breaking into" their machine. Every single time this was a web application using a port other then 80. These go 100% of the time unanswered by anyone but me explaining that they were just contacting us and the traffic is benign. I can't imagine what the future will bring with these proposed new laws. Any newbie with a firewall that suspects something is going to become a terrorist spotter. Quite scary. -- Ethan Zimmer - ezimmer () livewave tv Director of Research and Development LiveWave, Inc.
Current thread:
- Civil Disobedience John Thornton (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Nikola Krgovic (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Blue Boar (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Ken Pfeil (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience George Milliken (Oct 15)
- RE: Civil Disobedience Ken Pfeil (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Ethan Zimmer (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Jon O . (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Catherine Allen (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Craig Van Tassle (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Chris Ess (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Felix von Leitner (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Ian Stoba (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Tom Arseneault (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Ian Stoba (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Russell Handorf (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Felix von Leitner (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Sebastian Ip (Oct 15)
- Re: Civil Disobedience Chip Mefford (Oct 15)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Civil Disobedience dreamwvr () dreamwvr com (Oct 15)