Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Nettl HP-UX
From: Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:10:14 +0000 (UTC)
Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:
But if 1501-1535 are invalid, maybe at the very least an Expert Info should
be added to
report it?Yes. My copy of version 1 of the DEC/Intel/Xerox Ethernet spec doesn't say anything
about valid type field
values, unless I missed it. Perhaps version 2 does; in any case, perhaps we
should dissect frames with
type/length fields in that range as invalid rather than as having a type *or*
length field. OK, I committed a change so those invalid Ethernet frames will be dissected as such, and added an expert info as well. Not quite sure what to do in capture_eth() though, as I'm not completely sure what that function is for; maybe you could have a look? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Nettl HP-UX, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 17)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 20)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Kevin Cullimore (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)