Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Nettl HP-UX
From: Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:11:49 +0000 (UTC)
Kevin Cullimore <kcullimo@...> writes:
At the very least, it would prove extremely useful if Wireshark could distinguish between legitimate 802.1q frames and packets that contain too many bytes without a sufficient excuse.
If Wireshark is not dissecting something properly, please file a bug report for it and attach a small, relevant capture file that depicts the problem. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Nettl HP-UX, (continued)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 19)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Andrej van der Zee (Jun 20)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Guy Harris (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Kevin Cullimore (Jun 28)
- Re: Nettl HP-UX Chris Maynard (Jun 29)