Re: Nettl HP-UX

[Chris Maynard <Chris.Maynard () gtech com>]

Guy Harris <guy@...> writes:

> The capture_xxx() functions are for doing a very quick and dirty dissection of
packets while we're
> capturing traffic, so that instead of just showing a count of packets as we
capture, we can show a count of
> particular types of packets.  Therefore, the right thing to do with invalid
packets would be to count them
> as "other" packets and not bother doing any further dissection - just as we do
when doing a real dissection.

Right, thanks.  I normally hide the capture info dialog, so I forgot about those
statistics.

I checked in a change to explicitly increment the "other" count for these
invalid Ethernet frames, even though they would have been counted the same way
anyway in capture_ethertype(), but I think it's a little clearer this way.


___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe