Re: New openSAFETY dissector

[Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>]

Hello

Could someone please tell me, if sending a new dissector in as bug, is
the accepted method of adding a new dissector? If not, please tell me,
how I can resubmit the patch.

kind regards,
Roland

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
> Hello
>
> openSAFETY is a machine safety standard, which has been certified by
> TUEV Rheinland as well as other organizations for SIL 3 , and is
> currently implemented in a wide range of products.
>
> This plugin allows dissection of the openSAFETY protocol using the
> Industrial Ethernet Network standards Ethernet Powerlink as well as
> SercosIII .
>
> Also a basic UDP transport protocol is supported. Further versions of
> this plugin will also include a Modbus transport dissection.
>
> This plugin will be actively maintained and supported.
>
> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5753
>
> Please be so kind and review this submission and accept it to the main
> distribution.
>
> On a side node, I have a working 1.4 installation of this plugin
> (dissector_add_uint => dissector_add does the trick), but for now, the
> submission will be 1.5 only.
>
> kind regards,
> Roland
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe