Re: New openSAFETY dissector

[Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>]

Thank you, knew I was missing something

regards, Roland


2011/3/18 Stig Bjørlykke <stig () bjorlykke org>:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com> wrote:
> > Could someone please tell me, if sending a new dissector in as bug, is
> > the accepted method of adding a new dissector?
>
> Yes.  But you have to set review_for_checkin on the attached patch.
>
>
> --
> Stig Bjørlykke
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe